Manuel Ariel Garcia Periu
a minute
ago, at 8:47 PM
NEW
Top of Form
Based on the 2004 Healthy People Curriculum Task Force report, it is important to reform healthcare professional education to the point of minimizing healthcare errors and imparting to professionals’ other skills beyond their medical practice. Today, medical care routinely fails to deliver its potential benefits and instead harms patients too frequently (Nash et al., 2015). In the current healthcare education, several issues affect healthcare delivery, including dynamic patient-clinician relationships, complex delivery arrangements, continually expanding technological innovations and evidence base, and the shift from acute to chronic care. To adequately handle the changing dynamics in the healthcare sector, professionals need to be adequately prepared. The best preparation to offer to healthcare professionals is a reform in their education with the aim to incorporate all changing and modern healthcare dynamics (Momeyer et al., 2021). Reformed knowledge develops new skills and assumes new roles that are required to respond to the changing needs of the population.
The 2004 report provides abundant evidence of the need for reforms in the education of healthcare professionals, owing to existing serious and extensive quality issues. Current education has resulted in errors or harm to patients, delays, long waiting times, and the unnecessary duplication of services (Nash et al., 2015). There needs to be reforms in healthcare professionals’ education to incorporate the development of important interconnections and new synergies. Over the past, topics in healthcare professionals’ education have been somehow fragmented or separated (Momeyer et al., 2021). For example, medical education for the past half century has centered on purely medical content. Reform is necessary to ensure healthcare professionals study a range of additional skills, such as the whole dimensions of care delivery, experimental learning in diverse settings, and leadership and educational technologies (Nash et al., 2015). Healthcare professionals need more than the education offered within their scope of practice to lead and succeed in the modern, rapidly changing, and highly complex world.
References
Momeyer, M., Karl, J., & Shihabuddin, C. (2021). Walking the wellness talk. Nurse Educator, 47(1), 6-7.
https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001047
Nash, D., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R., & Oglesby, W. (2015). Population health: Creating a culture of wellness (2nd ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Bottom of Form
Reply
Rebeca Urbina
Healthcare Professional Education Reform
Reforms in healthcare professional education are urgently needed in the United States. Despite the best efforts of health professionals and other officials in the health sector to deliver quality services, it is clear that the health system is still ineffective in boosting the nation’s health. The Centers for Disease Control and Preventive (2021) also disclosed that the health system has failed to implement the healthy people program, which was created to lead nationwide education and prevention attempts to enhance the nation’s health. As a result, educational reforms for healthcare workers are critical if the goal of a healthy population is to be achieved.
Another reason for the need for reform in clinician education is to enable a shift from traditional education to modern-day training. The conventional healthcare professional education system focused on urgent and critical medical issues. Furthermore, traditional education has failed to integrate the principles of population health and prevention strategies necessary to accomplish a broader positive influence on the health of people (Nash et al., 2021). As a result, it is vital that health professional education be reformed to include new skills and techniques that promote community health. Education changes would play a key role in altering the healthcare system’s service delivery in this way.
Furthermore, technology improvements are another factor that necessitates a change in health-care practitioner education. This is because some of the methods and practices of providing healthcare services have developed as a result of technological advancements. The educational system should be revamped to teach professionals how to work with technologically advanced hospital equipment. Other reasons for the need for healthcare professional education reform include changing clinical information that has led to patient-centered care, working in interdisciplinary teams, and using evidence-based procedures (Griffith, 2021). The changes should be carried out to a conclusion that will involve diverse health sectors in taking activities to strengthen health policies and practices based on the latest available knowledge.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, May 25). Healthy people – healthy people homepage. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved January 25, 2022, from
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/index.htm
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021). Population health: Creating a culture of wellness. Jones and Bartlett Learning.
https://books.google.com/books?id=ToOHCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA61&lpg=PA61&dq=In+2004,+the+Healthy+People+Curriculum+Task+Force+emphasized+that+%22+an+essential+element+of+any+effort+to+change+a+health+care+system+must+be+the+education+of+future+clinicians+who+will+practice+new+approaches+in+new+contexts%22.&source=bl&ots=BgFzpyl8Sh&sig=ACfU3U1nmmKRWzSXLMWm6Rt9OPXPBlKU2g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwii3ouLxsv1AhU_QjABHVoRC94Q6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q&f=false
Griffith, D. M. (2021). Well-being in Healthy People 2030: a missed opportunity. Health Education & Behavior, 48(2), 115-117.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1090198121997744
Naiviv Barcelo
15 hours
ago, at 6:15 AM
Top of Form
Ecological model is the most suitable model that can be used in the community and health promotion framework that I have chosen. My health problem of choice is the increasing prevalence of different types of cancer and the health promotion strategy is educating people on the importance of preventing strategies such as healthy eating, regular physical exercises and regular screening. Ecological models considers individuals and their connection with relationship, community and societal factors (Robert & Nestor, 2017). Using the four stages of ecological model namely individual, relationship, community and society, the health promotion framework can be implemented successfully. The individual level identifies the personal and biological history of an individual that increases the risk of them getting cancer. This level focuses on the level of knowledge and skill an individual possesses with regard to cancer. Through education, individuals can have a change of attitude through learning more about different types of cancer, risk contributing factors and what they can do to prevent it.
The relationship level helps examine close relationships such as the family members and friends that may increase the risk of getting cancer. Family focusses prevention programs and peer programs may help promote positive norms within this level. Community level focuses on neighborhoods, workplaces, schools and the characteristics in these settings that may increase risk of cancer (Jill, 2017). Improving the social and physical environment in these settings may help address the issue of cancer and install positive attitude and behavior that lead to prevention of cancer. Societal level focuses on social, education, economics and health policies that help maintain social and economic inequalities between people in society. The level also focuses on social and cultural norms that increase the prevalence of cancer. Implementing policies that help fight and prevent cancer while promoting positive social and cultural norms is a suitable strategy to prevent cancer.
Some of the major strengths of the ecological model include the fact that it helps promote education among all four levels of the model increasing chances of changing individual attitude and behavior (Jill, 2017). The model also proves that it is less costly to prevent cancer rather than cure it. The model also encourages individuals to take initiative and adopt a healthy lifestyle to prevent cancer. Some of the limitations that may also prove to be barriers to implementing the model include adopting a healthy lifestyle can be costly and this might hinder individuals from living a healthy lifestyle due to financial constrain. Another limitation is that not all types of cancer are preventable rendering the model less effective.
Bottom of Form
DARLINE FRANCOIS
1/25/22, 2:03 PM
Top of Form
Individuals’ mental health is neither distinct nor separated from other aspects of their total personal health, nor is it shielded or sheltered from the political, economic, material, or social situations that surround them. Multiple elements across those levels (as well as characteristics found in more intrapersonal physiological and behavioral realms) will influence mental health. A mentally healthy electorate is one where such impacts are overwhelmingly favorable and strengthening for all segments that make up the population, resulting in a rising number of people in their ranks achieving that life quality and competency. “The process of facilitating individuals and groups to achieve control over the health determinants and so enhance their health” is how health promotion is defined. The principles of involvement, empowerment, and justice are at the heart of the effort. The project might be summarized as an effort to increase connectivity and literacy. A high level of connectivity will result in shared accountability and member participation in reciprocal efforts to improve public well-being. Increased capacity to obtain knowledge and utilize it to improve situations that affect personal and communal health will be referred to as health literacy.
The multidirectional intricacy and dynamic interactions of elements functioning inside and across different levels through macro (societal) to micro (individual) is reflected in the ecological model of community-based health promotion (individual). As a result of these elements, settings influence people both personally and professionally, while individual and group activities can have an immediate or broader impact. The approach also recognizes that interventions may be performed at a variety of locations to increase resilience and eliminate or diminish negative characteristics and that complementing action on several frontiers can yield a higher overall impact than activities focused on a single level or region. As a result, it necessitates multidisciplinary collaboration to appropriately address the wide range of challenges that affect a community’s health. As a result, it provides a matrix for identifying and directing methods that may be combined to form a coherent, reasonable reply with accumulated force to affect positive change in areas of concern.
To enact health development, appropriate mental health promotion includes applying the cycle of promoting health action stages to a specific psychological disorder (problems and determinants) inside two some or all of the nested ecological systems (by acting on impacts and so changing results).
Bottom of Form